The Fire is Real, and It's Getting Hotter

There's an old idiom about pulling chestnuts out of the fire—it means risking harm for someone else's benefit, or pursuing a reward so dangerous that the cost far exceeds any possible gain. Today, I argue that attempting to do business with China has become exactly that: a fool's errand where the burns are certain and the chestnuts increasingly worthless.

This isn't anti-China rhetoric. This is a sober assessment based on documented evidence of systematic market interference (Investigation Report INTL-2025-001), combined with observable structural collapse in China's domestic economy. Canadian policymakers and business leaders must face an uncomfortable truth: The China market that justified decades of engagement no longer exists, and what's replacing it poses existential risks to any foreign enterprise operating there.

What the Evidence Shows: A Coordinated Assault on Foreign Business

The recent international investigation into China's administrative interference tactics reveals a chilling pattern. This isn't about individual business disputes or regulatory misunderstandings. This is systematic, coordinated, politically-motivated economic coercion operating across multiple sectors simultaneously.

Cultural Censorship as Diplomatic Weapon: Japanese anime singer Maki Otsuki was forcibly removed from stage mid-performance in Shanghai—lights cut, security escorting her away while singing. Her crime? Being Japanese, 22 days after Japan's Prime Minister made statements supporting Taiwan. The entire three-day Bandai Namco Festival was cancelled. Pop superstar Ayumi Hamasaki's concert: cancelled with less than 24 hours notice. Then came the wholesale ban: Chinese authorities instructed venues nationwide to cancel all Japanese artist concerts through 2025 and stop accepting 2026 applications.

This affected musicians, anime events, films, musicals—billions of dollars in cultural exchange eliminated through administrative fiat. The message: cross China on Taiwan, and your citizens will be humiliated, your businesses punished, your market access revoked.

Technology Market Exclusion: In November 2025, China effectively eliminated foreign AI chip makers from the Chinese market entirely. Nvidia's market share dropped from 95% in 2022 to 0% in 2025. Not through competition—through government mandate requiring state-funded data centers to use only domestic chips. The directive even ordered data centers less than 30% complete to rip out already-installed foreign chips.

For context: China represented up to 25% of Nvidia's data-center revenue. Billions in market access—gone overnight.

Rare Earth Export Controls: On December 1, 2025, China implemented rare earth export restrictions targeting companies affiliated with foreign militaries. These materials are critical for defense systems, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and advanced electronics. China controls 70% of global mining and 90% of processing. This is economic leverage as strategic weapon.

Extraterritorial Legal Overreach: China's 2025 regulatory blitz—the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, the revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and the IP Countermeasures Framework—creates impossible compliance conflicts. These laws authorize Chinese authorities to seize intellectual property globally, prohibit exports to foreign entities anywhere in the world, and subject foreign companies to Chinese jurisdiction for conduct that occurs entirely outside China.

If a Canadian company complies with Canadian sanctions on China, China can seize its IP in retaliation. If it complies with Chinese anti-sanctions law, it violates Canadian law. There is no legal way to operate in both jurisdictions simultaneously.

Trade Agreement Violations: China committed to purchasing $200 billion in additional U.S. goods under the Phase One trade deal. Actual performance: U.S. exports to China declined from $32 billion (2023) to $27 billion (2024) to $14 billion annualized (2025). Near-zero soybean purchases despite specific pledges. China simply substituted Brazilian and other suppliers, using trade commitments as negotiating leverage rather than binding obligations.

The pattern is unmistakable: China deploys market access, regulatory enforcement, and administrative directives as instruments of political pressure. When diplomatic tensions arise, foreign businesses pay the price through humiliation, cancellation, market exclusion, or IP seizure.

The Deeper Structural Crisis: China's Domestic Market is Collapsing

But here's what makes the situation truly dire—even if you could navigate this regulatory minefield without political retaliation, the market you're risking everything to access is disintegrating.

The post-COVID era (2023-present) has revealed the fragility of China's economic model. The surveillance state that once enabled "stability" now suffocates private enterprise. The cost advantages that attracted foreign manufacturers have evaporated—high labor costs, rising regulatory burdens, and omnipresent government interference make China increasingly uncompetitive.

Capital Flight is Real: Foreign factories and companies are fleeing China in unprecedented numbers. This isn't Western propaganda—it's observable in foreign direct investment data, corporate announcements, and supply chain restructuring across every major industry. Companies are relocating to Vietnam, India, Mexico, and yes, back to North America.

Administrative Destruction of Entire Industries: The Chinese Communist Party has deployed administrative measures to deliberately destroy multiple domestic industries: online gaming (restrictions on minors, content controls), education training (entire sector effectively banned overnight), catering and hospitality (COVID restrictions evolved into permanent surveillance infrastructure). These weren't market corrections—these were political decisions that rendered billions in investment worthless and put hundreds of millions of people out of work.

Youth unemployment exceeded 20% before Chinese authorities stopped publishing the data. Think about that: The government stopped reporting unemployment because the numbers were too embarrassing. The real figures are almost certainly worse.

The Over-35 Purge: In China's workplace culture, being over 35 makes you effectively unemployable. Mass layoffs targeting older workers are standard practice, with no legal recourse, no social safety net, no questions asked. This isn't ageism in hiring—this is systematic exclusion of experienced workers from the labour force during their prime earning years.

Consumer Confidence Collapse: When hundreds of millions of people lose their jobs or live in constant fear of layoffs, when entire industries can be destroyed by administrative whim, when surveillance is omnipresent and arbitrary enforcement the norm—people hold onto their wallets tightly.

Consumer spending is collapsing. Domestic demand is evaporating. The property sector—which represented up to 30% of Chinese GDP—is in freefall, with major developers defaulting and millions of citizens holding mortgages on unfinished apartments that will never be completed.

China is No Longer the Biggest Eastern Market: The fundamental premise that justified engagement—access to 1.4 billion consumers—is obsolete. The Chinese domestic market is rapidly collapsing. When consumers can't spend, businesses can't profit. When the government can destroy your sector overnight, you can't plan. When you're subject to arbitrary political retaliation for your home government's foreign policy, you can't operate.

The market you're entering isn't a growth opportunity. It's a trap.

The Train Without Brakes: A 30-Year Decline Cycle

China's national fortune has reversed. This isn't a temporary downturn or a cyclical recession—this is a structural, long-term decline driven by political choices that cannot be reversed without fundamentally changing the nature of the regime.

The concentration of unrestrained power in the hands of Xi Jinping and the CCP has created a system where:

• Economic rationality is subordinate to political control: Private enterprise is tolerated only when it serves party objectives
• Rule of law is impossible: Laws are tools of political power, not constraints on it
• Innovation is stifled: Surveillance, censorship, and arbitrary enforcement destroy the risk-taking necessary for economic dynamism
• Demographics are catastrophic: Decades of one-child policy created an aging population with insufficient young workers to support it
• Debt is unsustainable: Local government debt, corporate debt, household debt—all at levels that cannot be serviced without growth that isn't coming

This is a train running toward a cliff without any brakes, and no one can stop it until hard landing.

The comparison to Japan's "lost decades" after 1990 is instructive, but incomplete. Japan had rule of law, democratic accountability, allied support, and technological leadership. China has none of these stabilizing factors—only authoritarian brittleness, international isolation, and an economic model dependent on exports to countries that increasingly view it as a strategic threat.

Barring a fundamental political transformation (which would require the CCP to voluntarily relinquish power—historically unprecedented), China is entering a 30-year decline cycle. The demographics alone guarantee this: You cannot reverse a collapsing birth rate in less than a generation, and China's birth rate has fallen below replacement for years.

What This Means for Canadian Policymakers and Businesses

For Canadian policymakers, the implications are stark:

1. End the China Engagement Illusion: The premise of engagement—that economic integration would moderate Chinese behavior and create mutual prosperity—has failed. The evidence shows China weaponizing economic interdependence, not being constrained by it. Canada's Indo-Pacific Strategy correctly identifies China as a "disruptive global power," but implementation must match rhetoric.

2. Prioritize Trade Diversification: Reduce dependence on Chinese markets and supply chains. Strengthen relationships with democratic trading partners through CPTPP, CUSMA, and bilateral agreements. The cost of diversification today is far less than the cost of disruption tomorrow.

3. Protect Critical Infrastructure and Technology: Follow allies in screening Chinese investment in sensitive sectors, restricting technology transfers, and securing supply chains for critical minerals, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals. The administrative interference evidence shows China will weaponize access and dependencies.

4. Support Business Exit and Restructuring: Canadian companies with significant China exposure need government support to restructure, relocate, and reduce risk. This includes financing for supply chain diversification, trade promotion in alternative markets, and diplomatic support for resolving disputes.

5. Strengthen Alliance Coordination: Work with Five Eyes partners, G7, and like-minded democracies to develop coordinated responses to Chinese economic coercion. The evidence shows China targeting individual countries to divide and pressure—collective responses are more effective.

For Canadian businesses, the message is even simpler: Get out while you can.

The Risk-Reward Calculation Has Fundamentally Changed: The investigation documents that market access in China is:

• Subject to arbitrary political cancellation without notice or compensation
• Conditional on accepting impossible legal compliance conflicts
• Hostage to foreign policy disputes you cannot control
• Declining in value as the domestic market collapses
• Protected by no meaningful legal recourse (WTO dispute settlement is paralyzed)

Even if you could successfully navigate these hazards (unlikely), you're investing in a market entering a multi-decade decline. The demographic, economic, and political fundamentals are irreversible without regime change.

The Chestnuts Aren't Worth the Burns: Every dollar invested in China is a dollar not invested in growing markets with rule of law, political stability, and growth trajectories. Vietnam, India, Indonesia, Mexico, even reshoring to Canada—all offer better risk-adjusted returns than a Chinese market characterized by political interference, legal uncertainty, and structural collapse.

The Window for Orderly Exit is Closing: As China's economy deteriorates, capital controls will tighten, exit barriers will rise, and asset recovery will become harder. Companies that wait too long will find themselves unable to extract value, with investments stranded in a hostile jurisdiction. The time to restructure is now, while orderly exit is still possible.

Conclusion: Choose Wisely, Choose Survival

The evidence is overwhelming. China is deploying systematic economic coercion against foreign businesses, violating trade commitments, imposing extraterritorial legal claims, and targeting companies for political retaliation. Simultaneously, its domestic market is collapsing under the weight of authoritarian overreach, demographic decline, and unsustainable debt.

Attempting to do business in this environment is like pulling chestnuts out of the fire—you will get burned, and the chestnuts are rapidly turning to ash.

Canadian policymakers must abandon the engagement illusion and prioritize trade diversification, technology protection, and alliance coordination. Canadian businesses must conduct honest risk assessments and restructure away from China exposure before the window for orderly exit closes.

This isn't about ideology or geopolitics—this is about survival and sound business judgment. The China that justified decades of engagement is gone. What remains is a declining power using economic coercion to compensate for structural weakness, willing to sacrifice foreign business interests for domestic political imperatives.

The fire is real. The chestnuts are worthless. Walk away.

Those who ignore this reality will learn it the hard way—through cancelled contracts, seized assets, stranded investments, and impossible legal conflicts. Those who act now will look back at their China exposure as a bullet dodged.

The choice is stark: Acknowledge the evidence and adjust, or persist in denial and pay the price. I know which choice Canadian wisdom demands.

---

This editorial commentary is based on Investigation Report INTL-2025-001: "Systematic Administrative Interference: China's 2025 Campaign Against Foreign Businesses," which documents coordinated market interference tactics across cultural, technology, trade, and regulatory sectors. The full investigation is available at content/investigations/2025-11-30-china-administrative-market-interference.json.